在父亲的命令下，午夜12岁的小男孩阿通（Charlie Trairat 饰）被迫转到一个很远的寄宿学校上学。这里阴森肃杀，午夜古板的舍监每天都听一张跳了针的老唱片。从同学那里得知，他所睡的床更是睡过许多已死之人。但这些不快很快被一个男孩的出现抹去。清秀的男孩维钦（Sirachuch Chienthaworn 饰）与阿通成为无话不说的好朋友。可阿通很快发现，每天傍晚6点维钦都要消失一段时间。渐渐地，他发现了好朋友一个不为其所知的秘密……本片荣获2007年柏林国际电影节水晶熊奖、2007年泰国国家电影协会奖最佳艺术指导和最佳剪辑两个奖项。
马场弘文
回复 :卢浮宫博物馆馆长被人杀害在卢浮宫内，临死前他费力的留下骇人的符号，从而惊动了符号专家罗伯特·兰登（汤姆·汉克斯）。在破案过程中，兰登结识了死者的孙女，索菲（奥黛丽·塔图），俩人几次遇险，九死一生，逐渐产生爱慕之情。随着案情的深入，他们渐渐发现这起谋杀案后隐藏着天大的秘密，甚至牵连到隐匿多年的神秘组织——峋山隐修会。兰登按图索骥，发现所有的解密的密码都藏在达芬奇的作品中，而最让人震惊的是，索菲的身世一时间随之复杂起来，她究竟是谁？峋山隐修会再现江湖想要达到什么目的？
于凤翔
回复 :一对夫妻在自己矿井里发现古代邪教祭祀的遗迹，不想丈夫被邪灵附体，恶灵为一只邪恶之手
叶丽仪
回复 :Constantly on the hunt and suffering from hallucinations that drive his violent nature, an unnamed man is capturing women and savagely beating them to death. Meanwhile, a woman is luring men into a violent end, by way of her knife. Driven by the same force to make the opposite sex suffer, the killers’ fates intertwine. The two must face off in a battle to the death, in which they are forced to reveal the horrible truth behind their addiction to murder.“Brutal” takes an interesting approach to its visuals, drawing heavy influence from Western “Grindhouse” films, using a filter to make the footage appear grainy, damaged, and with light and color fluctuations. Unfortunately, the visual styling ends up feeling misguided, as other than applying the filter it does not imitate any other aspects of the “Grindhouse” genre. Despite trying to dirty up the film, it is apparent it was shot on digital. The cinematography is also a step above most “Grindhouse” productions, with Takashi Hirose proving he has talent behind the camera. Exterior shots to those taking place in small spaces are all competently framed, lit, and transition well. The decision to add an effect on top of the work hurts the film’s imagery and even gives a sense of desperation to try to capture a certain type of nostalgia with the audience, instead of relying on its own strengths. It is unfortunate when one creative choice can hurt a production so much.The story of “Brutal” is simple but effective, it does attempt some sort of social commentary about the violent nature of men and women, but it does not offer enough depth into the subject to justify the amount of violence on display. The film does end on a strong note with an interesting twist, with a reveal that is bound to gross some out, while giving others a chuckle. In spite of its simple nature, those who enjoy films that make them somewhat uncomfortable and enjoy the challenge of getting through some ultra-violence, “Brutal” poses a fun and entertaining challenge in that regard.
