阿乐（周英杰 饰）、曰韩诗敏（周丽淇 饰）和阿力（周子驹 饰）是三位拥有着特异血型的青年，曰韩三人彼此并不相识，但是却有奇异的感应，这令三人感到十分不安，不知其中究竟发生了什么变故。原来，三人的共同点在于都献过血，而他们的血液被用于了抢救一对殉情的男女。结果是，男方从幸运地被从死亡线上拉了回来，女方却不幸地踏入了鬼门关。女子名叫燕屏（梁敏德 饰），孤身一人来到地府的她感到十分痛苦，竟将所有的过错都怪到了阿乐、诗敏和阿力所献的血液头上。燕屏伺机接近三人，她要好好地报一报他们的“救命之恩”。面对穷凶极恶的厉鬼，三人能否死里逃生？
陈诗雨
回复 :一位富裕的公子哥成天无所事事，好像已经放弃了理想，迷失了自我；而他的女仆却踌躇满志、努力生活着。当两人生活搅在一起，他们的矛盾好像更深了。入围第71届戛纳电影节。
回复 :纽约州人民集体控告克劳蒂心智不健，行为威胁大众安全。可怜的克劳蒂完全被吓坏了，她的坦率直言，竟被形容为具有杀伤力，目中无人，于是她振作精神；全力反控，一场法院里的审判会，与法院公设辩护人员展开精彩辩论……
尾崎丰
回复 :A most pleasingly atmospheric rendition of the tale, noirishly photographed and moodily set, this is the version which probably would have delighted Conan Doyle the most. There is one important plot change which enables the beautiful Alice Brandt to enjoy both a larger role and a more intriguing part in the proceedings. This change also builds up the parts of Dr Mortimer and Lord Charles, yet at the same time provides a nice introduction to the is-he-sinister or is-he-a-good-guy Barrymore, deftly played here by Fritz Rasp.Despite the sting of its well-developed story, the spellbindingly atmospheric direction and the engrossing performances delivered by the entire cast, many fans may find this version somewhat disappointing. For at least three reasons: As in the novel, the part played in the narrative by Sherlock Holmes, though vital, is minimal. And in this version, not only has no attempt been made to enlarge his role, if anything both writer and director do their best to minimize it. Holmes does not even make his entrance for half-an-hour, and when he does finally appear, he has his back to the camera. It is Fritz Odemar, as Dr Watson, who receives the more favorable camera angles. And there is a purpose in this. It is Watson, not Holmes, who figures as the main protagonist of The Hound of the Baskervilles. For the bulk of the narrative, Holmes disappears. It is Watson and Lord Henry (Peter Voss) who take up the running. The movie is almost over, before Holmes closes in on the villain. And even so, this is not the obsessed, self-important Holmes we are accustomed to see taking charge. Another problem is that the title hound itself does not figure a great deal in the action, a downgrading which will undoubtedly rate as another major disappointment for fans. And finally, it could be argued that the script gives too much attention to Conan Doyle's red herring, the escaped convict, and not enough to the real villain.This said, it must surely be admitted by all, that Odemar's interpretation of Watson—intelligent, charming, level-headed, courageous and resourceful—is much closer to Conan Doyle's conception than either the bungling, inveterately stupid Nigel Bruce or the self-effacing Ian Fleming.One other player deserves special mention: Erich Ponto (Dr Winkel in The Third Man) who seems exactly right for Stapleton. A difficult part, superbly played.- JohnHowardReid, imdb
