埃里克．冯．施特罗海姆导演的此片，合集在1952年比利时蒙达尔国际电影节评选的电影诞生以来的12部“最佳影片中”名列第七；在1952、合集1962年英国《画与音响》评选的10部“最佳影片”中，名列第七和第四位；在1958年比利时布鲁塞尔世界博览会评选电影“最佳电影”中，该片名列第六；在1978年《标题》杂志刊登的电影诞生以来的100部“最佳影片”中，名列第18位。故事主要描写麦克．蒂格和马库斯．斯科勒这对好友因五千美元彩券而变得凶残成性，贪婪吝啬，最后引出一系列的悲剧的过程
回复 :亚历克斯·沃尔夫(《勇敢者游戏》《恐袭波士顿》)将执导个人首部电影长片《猫与月亮》(The Cat and the Moon)，他自己编写剧本并担任主演，卡司还包括米莎·巴顿、迈克·艾普斯(《星路多懊悔》《生化危机3》)、斯凯勒·吉桑多(《小镇滋味》《博物馆奇妙夜3》)、斯蒂芬妮娅·欧文(《可爱的骨头》《凯莉日记》)、汤米·尼尔森(《月升王国》)等。讲述青少年尼克(沃尔夫)来到纽约，与已故父亲的爵士音乐家朋友卡尔(艾普斯)暂时居住在一起，他的母亲在康复中心生活。在此期间，尼克结交了一群朋友，见识到了纽约的多样性。巴顿饰演Jessica Petersen，吉桑多饰演Seamus，欧文饰演Eliza，尼尔森饰演Russell。
曾宝仪
回复 :小雅成长在一个并不幸福的家庭之中，因此对爱和亲情格外的渴望。小雅和男友王浩交往已经三年之久了，虽然小雅非常希望能够和爱人携手步入婚姻的殿堂，但是王浩这边却迟迟没有动静。一天，两人跟一群朋友们一起打算去野外露营，途中遇见了陌生的搭车客阿南。当晚，王浩向小雅求婚了，这让小雅惊喜无比，整个人都沉浸在幸福之中。可是，这样的幸福并没能够维持多久，第二天，王浩失踪了。朋友们分成了两派，以小雅为首的一派决定深入丛林，寻找王浩的下落，就这样，他们上路了。物资的匮乏，地理环境的险恶让一行人很快就意识到，他们陷入了麻烦之中。
回复 :Sam (Matthew Broderick) is the reasonable man in a crazy urban world, the man of thoughtfulness and refined taste in a landscape of Leroy Neiman paintings and beer commercials. The guy would sooner cook for an hour over a hot stove than say `supersize it.'By day he's a store clerk in an upscale gourmet eatery, and these scenes raise a smile, especially for anyone who's visited the actual chain in New York City -- the portrayal isn't far off from the reality. Our man is besieged by hoards of customers who want their imported French cheese cut to impossibly exact standards. His efforts to remain outwardly polite (while you know he'd like to take the cleaver to the relentless clientele) are pretty funny, and will warm the hearts of clerks everywhere. In general, Broderick is in good form and provides the movie with most of whatever lightness it possesses.Sciorra's lovelorn dental hygienist, Ellen, is fine enough, too, and her unknowing interaction with our cheese-slicing hero shows some hopeful chemistry, and you may begin to feel you want to see these two get together.One of the main competitors for our lady's affections, a stockbroker (Kevin Anderson), is played as caricature he's the beer swilling frat-boy whose idea of after-sex sensitivity is flipping on the football game. He's kind of funny at times, but the movie might be stronger if he was written or acted for us to like him more, instead of having us merely recognize him as the flat-out `wrong' guy in comparison to Broderick's sensitive man. Think of John Candy in Splash, taking a cigarette and beer can to the racquetball game; we know his lifestyle is not the one our hero should emulate, but we can't help but be charmed by the likeable goon. Whereas this character is merely a goon, and pretty unlikable all around.While it's a nice enough light movie for the first half, for me the story was somewhat derailed by its unbelievable (Hollywood) presentation of sex and adultery. (SPOILER AHEAD, skip to next paragraph.) When Ellen returns home after an evening's misadventures, she is naturally faced with the questioning husband (Michael Mantell). Quickly admitting her own indiscretion, she then immediately turns the situation around, demanding to know why the guy had gone ahead and bought a house without discussing it. Granted, it's a valid issue, and granted, many people use this countering maneuver in arguments. What's unbelievable is what happens next the guy starts responding to her question, addressing the house-issue in a quiet, thoughtful manner. WHOA. You'd be hard pressed to find a married person in the world who, when faced with hisher partner's totally unexpected adultery, would be ready to address anything so calmly. The guy would surely be bouncing off the walls, or else crushed into silence and tears - but see, then we might actually feel for the poor schnook, and we'd see Sciorra's character in a poor light. And since that particular audience reaction doesn't serve the romantic comedy, the story tries to sneak around it. You may start to feel that, like the husband, you're being taken.Further dissatisfaction is just around the corner in the ending. We realize this is where misunderstandings will get sorted out, and our couple will finally see a clear path to one another. We want the satisfaction of rooting for them. But it's marred by another unbelievable character reaction, followed by an abrupt conclusion that feels rushed and forced, too easy and unearned. You may feel as though the movie's cheating on you again...
