35歳にしてヴァージン、情事引きこもりでニートの和子(白木優子)は、情事動画投稿サイトでひたすら縄跳びをする女子高生の明日香(月本愛)を眺めてスケッチをしていた。暫くすると、背景にサラリーマン風の男が映り込み、幸せそうな顔で牛乳とジャムパンを食べ始める。和子はその男が気になり、同居の妹・美沙(通野未帆)が婚約者と同居する事もあいまって家を出る事にする。行く当てのない和子はとりあえず動画投稿の公園に行くと、縄跳び女子高生の明日香と出会う事ができ、ジャムパン男の事を尋ねると、彼は実家の民宿を継ぐ為に静岡に帰ったと知らされる。それを聞き、和子は立ち上がり静岡へ向かおうとするが、なぜか明日香も後を追う事になり…
回复 :2025年，战争结束的一年后，乌克兰军人塞吉回到现实生活。创伤后的日子并不容易，工厂主管嫌弃、同袍轻生、关厂失业，连家裡的熨斗都不管用，只能在野外猛射人形靶发洩。失业的他因缘际会加入挖寻军人遗体的「黑色鬱金香」计画，认识了志工卡蒂亚，在荒芜废地挖掘的同时，也像掏挖著满是创伤的自己，打开被战争所侵蚀的腐肉，希冀能长出生存的勇气。乌克兰与俄罗斯间的战争带来空前生态灾难，导演以独特的镜头语言、惊人的场景与摄影，为人物打造出剧场般的舞台。以满佈地雷的区域、废弃的矿场与工厂污染的土地与水源，突显人们面对冰冷的战后景况，是如何的渺小而无用。片中更巧妙植入前苏联名导狄嘉维托夫作品，搬演一齣讽刺幽默的冷调人生。「在乌克兰，你必须当个乐观主义者。」——瓦伦廷瓦夏诺维奇
回复 :Whenever I see La Paura I think of it as a companion piece to Eyes Wide Shut, or maybe it is the other way around. Adultery makes both films tick but in different ways. I think Phillip French was right on the money when he pointed out a Wizard of Oz thing in Kubrick's last work. Like Dorothy, Tom and Nicole go through fantasies and nightmares and at the end Dorothy's reassuring childish motto "there's no place like home" is ironically updated to the adult circumstantial adage "there's no sex like marital sex". Kubrick's take is intellectual, he never leaves the world of ideas to touch the ground. He taunts the audience first with an erotic movie and then with a thriller and refuses to deliver either of them. He was married to his third wife for 40 years, until he died. Rossellini was still married to Ingrid Bergman when he directed La Paura; they had been adulterous lovers and their infidelity widely criticized La Paura is a tale, a noirish one. The noir intrigue is solved and the tale has a happy ending. The city is noir; the country is tale, the territory where childhood is possible. The transition is operated in the most regular way: by car, a long-held shot taken from the front of the car as it rides into the road, as if we were entering a different dimension. Irene (Bergman) starts the movie: we just see a dark city landscape but her voice-over narration tells us of her angst and informs us that the story is a flashback, hers. Bergman's been cheating on her husband. At first guilt is just psychological torture but soon expands into economic blackmail and then grows into something else. From beginning to end the movie focuses on what Bergman feels, every other character is there to make her feel something. Only when the director gives away the plot before the main character can find out does he want us to feel something Bergman still can't. When she finds out, we have already experienced the warped mechanics of the situation and we may focus once again on the emotional impact it has on Bergman's Irene. In La Paura treasons are not imagined but real, nightmares are deliberate and the couple's venom suppurates in bitter ways. Needless to say, Ingrid has another of her rough rides in the movies but Rossellini doesn't dare put her away as he did in Europa 51, nor does he abandon her to the inscrutable impassivity of nature (Stromboli). His gift is less transcendent and fragile than the conclusion of Viaggio in Italia. He just gives his wife as much of a fairy tale ending as a real woman can have, a human landscape where she can finally feel at home. Back to the country, a half lit interior scene where shadows suggest the comfort of sleep. After all, it's the "fairy godmother" who speaks the last words in the movie.
张茜
回复 :Voice 1 (male "professional announcer" type): This neighborhood(1) was made for the wretched dignity of the petty bourgeoisie, for respectable occupations and intellectual tourism. The sedentary population of the upper floors was sheltered from the influences of the street. This neighborhood has remained the same. It was the strange setting of our story, where a systematic questioning of all the diversions and works of a society, a total critique of its idea of happiness, was expressed in acts.These people also scorned "subjective profundity". They were interested in nothing but an adequate and concrete expression of themselves.
